Quote:
Originally Posted by Beefy
The difference with Chelsea as i understand it is Abramovich has used his own money and it's his club so if he walks away Chelsea aren't left owing anything, all they'll have is a large wage bill. In Man Utd and Liverpools case the owners have mortgaged the club, therefore until that's paid it's owned by the mortgage company. This means that Man Utd and Liverpool are yhe ones in financial jeopardy not Chelsea  |
Correct. You see thats the thing a lot of fans dont understand when they say Man Utd are a stable club but Chelsea would be screwed if Abramovich left. Its actually quite the opposite
Kelly - You say Mancini for the Chelsea job. Can you tell some stuff about him coz i aint a fan of italian football and dont really know too much about this Mancini guy
